Home Multi-Country Search About Admin Login
Cenozoic
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
Permian
Carboniferous
Devonian
Silurian
Ordovician
Cambrian
Neoproterozoic


Main source = Baratov, R.B., et al. (1976). Subdivisions of stratified and intrusive rocks of Tajikistan. Publishing House "Donish", Dushanbe, 269 pp. plus tables. Provided by Dr. Jovid Aminov, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan Translated to English by the GeoGPT group, Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou, China--see About

Search by
Select Region(s) to search
Hold Ctrl (Windows/Linux) or Command (Mac) to select multiple
Takhtabulak Formation
Click to display on map of the Ancient World at:
Takhtabulak Fm base reconstruction

Takhtabulak Fm


Period: 
Permian

Age Interval: 
Upper Permian, M1-M3d


Province: 
SE Tajik (SE Pamir)

Type Locality and Naming

Includes in SE Murghab district (Mynkhadjr type), SE Murghab district (Istyk type (Dunkeldyk area), SE Murghab district (Gurdumdin type), SE Murghab district (Gurdumdin type Kastanatdjilga, Buryukurmes rivers), SE Murghab district (Gurdumdin type Shin and Igrymiyu rivers), SE Murghab district (Gurdumdin type Gurumd and Kattamardzhana rivers).

The Takhtabulak Formation was established by Dutkevich (1937) and later subdivided into three units by Grunt and Dmitriev (1973). [It is unclear in the publications, but either a lateral equivalent or the upper of the “three units” might be the Kastanatdjilgin Fm (кастанатджилrинская свита) of massive organogenic limestones with a thickness of 40-80 m, enclosing at the base and within themselves interlayers of limestone conglomerates?]

Synonym: Тахтабулакская толща , Taktabulak stratum, Takhtabulak Fm

Reference section:


Lithology and Thickness

It is composed of tuffs, tuffaceous shales, volcanic sandstones, and gravelites, containing lenses of spilite-diorites and dolerite porphyrites. Most of the formation is made of dark green volcaniclastic sandstones, shales and subordinate conglomerates, with sedimentary structures as parallel lamination and gradation; rare intercalations of sandy calcarenites occur. Sandstones are dominated by mafic volcanic detritus including abundant basalt grains and lathwork rock fragments.

At the base of the formation in the Kutal 2 section, meter-sized boulders of basaltic lavas and limestones are embedded in volcaniclastic sandstones. In the middle part of the formation in the Kuristyk section and at Mudzubulak, meter-sized boulders of stratified bioclastic limestones and algal, coral, and sponge biostromes occur. Microfacies of bioclastic limestones reveal coarse packstones with fusulinids, rugosa and tabulate corals, sphinctozoans, brachiopods, echinoderms, ostracods and carbonate and volcanic extraclasts. The upper part of the series is formed by interbedded marly shales, limestones, cherts, sandstones. Its thickness is 0-140 m.


Lithology Pattern: 
Volcanic ash


Relationships and Distribution

Lower contact

Angiolini et al. (2015) place the boundary with the underlying Gan Gr (Kutal Fm) at an ash bed (frequently covered) which marks the disappearance of limestones. In the Kutal 2 section, the formation starts with a huge olistrostrome enclosing meter-sized boulders of basaltic lavas and limestones (Supplementary Fig. S2) covered by green volcaniclastic sandstones, whereas in the Kuristyk section, the base of the formation consists of volcaniclastic sandstones.

Upper contact

Regional extent

It is widespread in the Southeast Pamir.


GeoJSON

{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[72.88,37.85],[73.25,38.18],[73.45,38.19],[74.49,38.09],[74.6,37.95],[74.65,37.92],[74.64,37.81],[74.52,37.69],[74.52,37.63],[74.68,37.44],[74.65,37.39],[74.54,37.38],[74.53,37.4],[74.38,37.39],[74.35,37.42],[74.28,37.4],[74.23,37.41],[74.23,37.38],[74.18,37.33],[73.92,37.28],[73.82,37.24],[73.72,37.23],[73.61,37.25],[73.6,37.27],[73.65,37.31],[73.76,37.34],[73.76,37.42],[73.61,37.44],[73.8,37.52],[73.85,37.63],[73.79,37.71],[73.28,37.73],[73.01,37.83],[72.88,37.85]]]]}}

Fossils

“The intercalation of bioclastic limestones and the boulders of coral-sponge-bryozoan bioconstructions embedded in the formation contains a very rich biota of fusulinids (Reichelina pulchra), smaller foraminifers, algae, brachiopods (Anchorhynchia sarciniformis,

Costisteges sp. ind., Enteletella nikschitshi, Enteletes dzaghrensis, E. meridionalis, Heterelasmina lepton, Martinia bisinuata, M. aff. warthi, M. rupicola, M. sp. 1, M. sp. 2., Notothyrina pontica, Notothyris pseudodjoulfensis, Orthothichia avushensis, Parenteletes ruzhencevi, Paramarginifera sp. ind., Streptorhyncus aff. pelargonatus, and Stenoscisma armenica), bivalves, echinoderms, bryozoans, tabulate and rugosa corals and sponges (sphinctozoans)” (Angiolini et al., 2015) Here, representatives of foraminifera genera, unknown in deposits older than the Pamir horizon, have also been found: Palaeofusulina, Reichelina, Colaniella, Codonofusiella. In addition, representatives of older Neoschwagerina, Verbeekina, Sumatrina, Armenina, Cancellina, Pseudodoliolina have been encountered.


Age 

Upper Permian. “According to Grunt and Dmitriev (1976), fusulinids and brachiopods in the lower part of the formation suggest a late Dzhulfian-early Dorashamian (Late Permian) age, which is in agreement with our finding that the top of the underlying Gan Formation is early Late Permian (earliest Wuchiapingian). [According to Leven (1998), Colaniella parva and Palaeofusulina aff. fusiformis occur at the base of the Takhtabulak Formation. If these determinations were correct, then the age of the Takhtabulak Formation would be Changhsingian also at its base. However, these specimens are not figured in Leven (1967, 1998), so it is not possible to confirm their taxonomic determinations, as we have not found any in our sections.] The conodont Clarkina subcarinata (Sweet) was found in the upper part of the formation by Kozur (1994), indicating a Changhsingian age. Thus, the formation is here considered to span the Wuchiapingian-Changhsingian.” (Angiolini et al., 2015)

Age Span: 

    Beginning stage: 
Wuchiapingian

    Fraction up in beginning stage: 
0.0

    Beginning date (Ma): 
259.55

    Ending stage: 
Changhsingian

    Fraction up in the ending stage: 
1.0

    Ending date (Ma):  
251.90

Depositional setting

In the sections examined by Angiolini et al. (2015), the local facies of this formation is: “The pure volcaniclastic composition, recorded by the detrital modes of the Taktabulak Fm, attests to erosion of a mafic volcanic edifice. Sedimentary structures in the volcaniclastic sandstones and conglomerates are also indicative of resedimentation along a slope. Tectonic activity should have been intense, with slope instabilities causing resedimentation of meter-sized olistoliths of bioclastic limestones, biostromes and basaltic lavas. There are several features, which suggest that both the bioclastic limestone boulders and the bioconstructions are olistoliths transported along the slope. The limestone boulders are in fact stratified obliquely to the S0 of the formation. The build-ups are not growing on the sandstones of the slope as suggested by Grunt and Dmitriev (1973), as most reefal organisms are in life position but they are discordant to the stratigraphic polarity of the succession.” [However, one must be careful to generalize these local observations to the regional extent of this unit.]


Depositional pattern:  


Additional Information


Compiler:  

Extracted from Baratov, R. B. (1976). Subdivisions of stratified and intrusive rocks of Tajikistan. Donish, Dushanbe, 276.

Angiolini, L., et al. (11 authors) (2015) From rift to drift in South Pamir (Tajikistan): Permian evolution of a Cimmerian terrane. Jour. Asian Earth Sciences, 102: 146-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.08.001